LADY JUSTICE IS IN CONTROL OF CARINO'S CIVIL RIGHTS CASES NO FEAR IF CARINO IS DOING WHAT IS RIGHT WITHIN THE PRECEPT OF THE LAW-- ADDING A POINT OF DEFENSE MUST NOT BE TAKEN AS A MENTAL CASE

Below are some Exhibits to support my Brief

THE ART OF DISPUTE --ROSALINDA O. CARINO'S POEM INTENDED TO IMPLICATE JUDGE PETER BARISO AND JUDGE JOHN YOUNG VIA JUDGE SALLY ANNE FLORIA --( Poetic allegory to describe the behaviors of Judge Floria who blocks Justice to serve to Carino by her order to move me outside of my venue, thus she ask the help of another Assignment Judge Bariso of Hudson County who in turn ordered the Mental evaluation of Carino to Judge Young. It is everyone's right to fight for its civil rights and it is not a mental condition to do that.)

JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED IS THE FORCEFUL ARGUMENT PRESENTED BY CARINO TO JUDGE FLORIA'S BEHAVIOR - A COGENT TRIAL GRILLING CARINO INTO IDEA OF CONSPIRACY THEORY

this is now that accusation of Catellano that Carino is a THEFT which was dismissed by the discovery of the true facts by Judge Frasca of the Essex County Remand Court and of course the proof of dismissal by judge Frasca

This is now that other Det. Todd who accused Carino as a Theft

This is now another proof of Carino's winning proof of improper tax sale to Atkind

REPETITION OF A PREEMPTED/PRECEDENT CASE WHERE CARINO IS RELEASED AS INNOCENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE - - Final Deliberation of Carino in the Trial Court of Judge.Young

Rosalinda O. Carino Expose' Freedom from Oppression - IS WHERE TO FIND BETTER UNDERSTANDING ON WHAT HAPPEN TO ALL CARINO'S CASES AS SHOWN IN THE INTERNET PUBLICATION

Sets of Exhibits of Letter of Judge Shuster; Delores White; Castellano State-v-Carino as a Theft; Dismissal of that by Judge Frasca and the Veniero's Dear Ms. Kristied

ONE LEARNS TO FIGHT FOR IT'S RIGHT WHEN OPPRESSION IS OBVIOUS -- CONSPIRACY THEORY BOTH TRUMP AND CARINO WENT THROUGH IT

Exhibit refund of Carino's filing fee against Jdg. Floria barred by Federal court Jdg. Wigenton possible part of the conspiracy theory

Exhibit  on accusation Carino is a theft and judge Frasca discovered Carino's case is completely on records

This is now the 81 & 79 bought in one title that the Belleville Township abused. this is my winning proof of Carino-v-Township of Belleville and the winning proof of Carino-v-District Court of U.S.A.

UNTIL CARINO IS SERVED WITH THE RIGHTEOUSNESS INTENTION IN THE 4 WRITS OF EXECUTION BE EXECUTED BY SHERIFF FONTOURA ,THE FIGHT FOR JUSTICE IS NOT OVER -- FOUR WRITS OF EXECUTION ARE CARINO'S PERSONAL PROPERTIES

Below are Sets of Exhibits and Dolores Foreclosure to Compare with Judge Shuster's Signature

ASSERTING ONE'S CIVIL RIGHTS TO DEFEND ITSELF MUST NOT BE TAKEN AS A MENTAL CONDITION :JUDGE YOUNG MISTAKENLY ORDERED IT - Motion for Witnesses to bring documents for Carino's defense and Ending the persecution on Carino in the fight for justice

THE DISBELIEF OF JUDGE FLORIA AND TRIAL JUDGE YOUNG AGAINST CARINO'S POSITIVE EVIDENCES, UPON WHICH, 5 ESSEX COUNTY JUDGES DISCOVERED THE TRUTH AND TRUE FACTS OF CARINO'S COMPLAINT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE - - THE DISCOVERY OF COERCION AND INTIMIDATION IS A STRONG DEFENSE

CARINO'S PLEADINGS AND SUPPLICATIONS

CARINO'S LETTER TO MR. FONTOURA